Comparing Welfare Regime Changes: Living Standards and the Unequal Life Chances of Different Birth Cohorts

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 13, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.2.2.502

Main Article Content

Louis Chauvel
Institut d'études politiques de Paris

Abstract

This article focuses on inter-and intra-cohort inequalities of living standards in a comparative perspective, underlining the diversity of national responses to the challenges of economic slow down, stronger economic competition and globalisation and their implications on different age groups. The aim is to make a connection between national Welfare regimes and the emergence of specific cohort-based economic constraint patterns in different countries, which are about to produce specific social generations2. I highlight the emergence of ‘scarring effects’; that is the irreversible consequences of (short term) social fluctuations in the context of socialisation on the (long term) life chances of different birth cohorts. These scarring effects can affect specific birth cohorts in countries where the welfare regime provides the context for increasing polarisation between middle-aged insiders and young outsiders. This is characterised by a lack of resilience to early career difficulties faced by cohorts of young adults.

Article Details

Issue
No. 2 (2009): Young Generation Under Pressure?
Section
Articles

Articles in IGJR are being published under the Creative-Commons License "CC 4.0 BY". On the basis of this license, the article may be edited and changed, but the author always has to be credited for the original work. By sending your article to IGJR, you agree to the publication of your article under this license. Please contact us if you do not want to have your article be published under CC 4.0 BY.

Author Biography

Louis Chauvel, Institut d'études politiques de Paris

Prof. Dr. Louis Chauvel habilitated in 2003 at the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris, where he is now a professor. His main study interests are analysing
social structure and the changing between generations. Since 2005, Prof. Dr. Chauvel is General Secretary of the European Sociological Association. He is also a member of the executive committees of the International Sociological association (ISA).

References

Attias-Donfut, Claudine (2000): Rapports de générations: transferts intrafamiliaux et dynamique macrosociale. In : Revue française de sociologie. Vol. 41 (4/2000), 643-684.

Bell, Lisa / Burtless, Gary, / Smeeding, Timothy / Gornick, Janet. (2007): Failure to Launch: Cross - National Trends in the Transition to Economic Independence. Lis Working Paper, Nr. 456.

Brzinsky-Fay, C. (2007): Lost in Transition? Labour Market Entry Sequences of School Leavers in Europe. In: European Sociological Review. Vol. 23 (4/2007), 409-422.

Chauvel, Louis (1998): Le destin des générations. Structure sociale et cohortes en France au XXe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Chauvel Louis (2000): Valorisation et dévalorisation sociale des titres. Une comparaison France – Etats - Unis. In: Zanten, Agnès van (ed.): L’état de l’école. Paris: La Découverte, 341-352.

Chauvel, Louis (2006): Social Generations, Life Chances and Welfare Regime Sustainability. In: Pepper. D. Culpepper / Peter. A. Hall / Bruno, Palier (eds.): Changing France. The politics that markets make. Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 341-352.

Chauvel, Louis (2007): Generazioni sociali, prospettive di vita e sostenibilità del welfare. In: La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali. Vol. 4 (3/2007), 43-72.

Easterlin, Richard A. (1961) : The American Baby Boom in Historical Perspective. In: American Economic Review. Vol. 51 (5/1961), 869-911.

Easterlin, Richard A. / Schaeffer, Christine M. / Maucunovich, Diane J. (1993): Will the baby boomers be less well off than their parents?. Income, wealth, and family circumstances over the life cycle in the United States. In: Population and Development Review. Vol. 19 (3/1993), 497-522.

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990): The Tree Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Esping-Andersen Gøsta (1999): Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta / Gallie, Duncan / Hemerijck, Anton / Myles, John (2002): Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ferrera, Maurizio (1996): The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe. In: Journal of European Social Policy. Vol. 1 (6/1996), 17-37.

Fourastié, Jean (1979): Les Trente Glorieuses ou la révolution invisible. Paris: Fayard.

Heston, Alan, Summers / Robert / Aten, Bettina. (2006): Penn World Table Version 6.2. The University of Pennsylvania: Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices.

Maddison, A. (1982). Phases of capitalist development. Oxford: Oxford university press.

Mannheim, Karl (1928): Le problème des générations. Paris: Nathan.

Mayer, Karl U. (2005): Life Courses and Life Chances in a Comparative Perspective. In: Svallfors, Stefan (ed.): Analyzing Inequality. Life Chances and Social Mobility in Comparative Perspective. Palo Alto / Kalifornien: Stanford University Press, 17-55.

Velde, Cécile van de (2008): Devenir adulte. Sociologie comparée de la jeunesse en Europe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.