Combining Intergenerational and International Justice

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 17, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.6.1.460

Main Article Content

Christoph Lumer
Università di Siena, Dipartimento di Filosofia

Abstract

Intergenerational justice not only requires the adoption of best practices and policies, but also the prevention and repression of deleterious and morally blameworthy human behaviour which have severe impacts on the long-term health, safety and means of survival of groups of individuals. While many international crimes have indirect consequences on the well-being of present and future generations, it cannot be said that existing international criminal law is currently well-placed to directly and clearly protect intergenerational rights. As such, the development of a new type of international crime, crimes against future generations, may be a promising avenue for implementing intergenerational justice. Such a crime would penalise acts or conduct that amount to serious violations of existing international law regarding economic, social and cultural rights or the environment.

Article Details

Issue
No. 1 (2012): The Interdependencies between Justices
Section
Articles

Articles in IGJR are being published under the Creative-Commons License "CC 4.0 BY". On the basis of this license, the article may be edited and changed, but the author always has to be credited for the original work. By sending your article to IGJR, you agree to the publication of your article under this license. Please contact us if you do not want to have your article be published under CC 4.0 BY.

Author Biography

Christoph Lumer, Università di Siena, Dipartimento di Filosofia

Christoph Lumer is professor of moral philosophy at the Uni- versity of Siena (Italy). His research interests include theories of justice, climate ethics, international and in- tergenerational justice.

References

Easterly, W (2006): The White Man’s Burden. Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. Oxford: Oxford U.P.

Kahneman, D / Deaton, A (2000): High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. Early Edition. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/08/27/1011492107.full.pdf+html. Viewed 4 August 2010.

Landes, D. S (1998): The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

Lumer, C (1999): Quellen der Moral. Plädoyer für einen prudentiellen Altruismus. In: Concep¬tus 32, 185-216.

Lumer, C (2009): Rationaler Altruismus. Eine prudentielle Theorie der Rationalität und des Altruismus. 2nd edition (1st edition 2000). Paderborn: Mentis.

Lumer, C (2002): The Greenhouse. A Welfare Assessment and Some Morals. Lanham, Md.; New York; Oxford: University Press of America.

Lumer, C (2009): Ethik humanitärer Interventionen. Eine konsequentialistische Konzeption. In: Fehige. C, Lumer. C, Wessels, U. (eds.): Handeln mit Bedeutung und Handeln mit Gewalt. Paderborn: mentis, 324-347.

Nagel, T (1970): The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon.

Partridge, E (1981): Why Care About the Future? In: Partridge, E (ed.): Responsibilities to Future Generations. Environmental Ethics. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 203-220.

Rawls, J (1999): A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition (1st edition 1971). Oxford (etc.): Oxford U.P.

Rawls, J (1985): Justice as Fairness. Political not Metaphysical. In: Philosophy and Public Affairs. 14 (3/1985), 223-251.

Rawls, J (1999): The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P.

Singer, P (2011): The Expanding Circle. Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. 2nd revised edition (1st edition 1981). Princeton; Oxford: Princeton U.P.

Singer, P (1993): How Are We to Live? Ethics in an Age of Self-Interest. Oxford: Oxford U. P.