Intergenerational Justice Review
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr
<h3> </h3>en-USIntergenerational Justice Review2190-6335<p>Articles in IGJR are being published under the Creative-Commons License "CC 4.0 BY". On the basis of this license, the article may be edited and changed, but the author always has to be credited for the original work. By sending your article to IGJR, you agree to the publication of your article under this license. Please contact us if you do not want to have your article be published under CC 4.0 BY.</p>Beyond state policy: the personal carbon footprint, climate equity, and the bottom-up imperative in the African region and Nigeria
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/25905
<p>State-centric, production-based climate governance has failed to deliver intergenerational justice, particularly for Africa. This article reframes the debate around the personal carbon footprint (PerCF), arguing that consumption-based accounting more accurately locates moral responsibility and that the subsistence-luxury distinction is essential for equitable policy in developing economies. A Nigerian case study illustrates both the structural constraints inflating involuntary emissions and the rising luxury footprint of an urban elite. Three reforms are proposed: a progressive bifurcated carbon tax, a national clean energy access fund, and a digital PerCF tracker.</p>Thomas AneniAdumaro Amabogha
Copyright (c) 2026 Thomas Aneni, Adumaro Rachel Amabogha
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-202026-07-2012110.24357/igjr.12.1.25905Exploring the legal obligation to reduce personal greenhouse gas emissions through climate litigation rulings
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/25906
<p>Against the backdrop of an accelerating climate crisis, legal frameworks are maturing globally. Due to litigation, they already establish legal obligations for states and private corporations to implement appropriate reduction regulations and measures for their greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, no globally agreed framework legally obligating individuals to reduce emissions has yet emerged. This article attempts to establish a legal basis for individual emission reduction obligations in light of this situation. Using international human rights conventions as a foundation, it argues that certain reduction obligations for individuals might exist, based on their respective circumstances. This conclusion is significant as a theoretical premise for incorporating individuals as key actors in future climate change countermeasures.</p>Masako Ichihara
Copyright (c) 2026 Masako Ichihara
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-202026-07-2012110.24357/igjr.12.1.25906Table of Contents
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/25903
IGJR-Editors
Copyright (c) 2026 IGJR-Editors
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-202026-07-2012110.24357/igjr.12.1.25903Marcel Fratzscher: After us, the future: a new intergenerational contract for freedom, security and opportunities
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/25908
Ben Jagasia
Copyright (c) 2026 Ben Jagasia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-202026-07-2012110.24357/igjr.12.1.25908Matthias Fritsch / Ferdinando G. Menga / Rebecca van der Post (eds.): Phenomenology and future generations: generativity, justice, and amor mundi
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/25907
Jason Adolph
Copyright (c) 2026 Jason Adolph
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-202026-07-2012110.24357/igjr.12.1.25907Editorial
https://igjr.org/ojs/index.php/igjr/article/view/25904
Jörg TremmelJason AdolphAlex Daniels
Copyright (c) 2026 Jörg Tremmel, Jason Adolph, Alex Daniels
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-07-202026-07-2012110.24357/igjr.12.1.25904